Contesting Wills and Estate Plans
Contesting the validity of wills and estate plans because of undue influence and/or a lack of capacity is the primary area of estate litigation. At the end of life, people often lose capacity and can be more easily influenced particularly because they become dependent upon others. Difficult cases often involve the combination of these two factors when diminished capacity is mixed with increased reliance upon others.
Individuals with diminished capacity can often be lead to make estate decisions that are contrary to plans made at an earlier time, when they had greater capacity or less dependence upon others. Below are a select group of reported decisions by the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal for which Kenneth Friesen has been counsel in this area:
Miller v. Miller Estate, 2011 BCSC 29
Maddess v. Racz, 2008 BCSC 1550
Maddess v. Racz, 2009 BCSC 1550
Northmark Mechanical Systems Inc. v. Watson (Estate), 2009 BCSC 1237
Northmark Mechanical Systems Inc. v. Estate of Madeline Strachan Watson, 2010 BCSC 176
Maddess v. Estate of Johanne Gidney, 2009 BCCA 539
Maddess v. Estate of Johanne Gidney, 2011 BCCA 165
Estate of Johanne Gidney v. Maddess, 2010 CanLII 32421, SCC No. 33587(application for leave to appeal dismissed)
Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. Hohite Semay St. Mary Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church, 2008 BCSC 797
Ethiopian Orthodox Church of Canada v. Hohite, 2009 BCSC 1379
Byle v. Carr-Harris, 2007 BCSC 1136
Byle v. 0143622 B.C. Ltd., 2010 BCSC 596
Byle v. 0143622 B.C. Ltd., 2010 BCSC 1378
McEachern v. 752265 B.C. Ltd., 2009 BCSC 1290
McGrane v. Epp, 2010 BCSC 1018
Ram v. Prasad s.c.
Ram v. Prasad c.a.
Vandervelde s.c.